Conversation began with one person directly regarding Rush Limbaugh. In jumps this person, who later called our direct conversation a debate 😮 which was news to me given a debate starts with both parties KNOWING they’re debating, and involves questions and answers, not insults and berating-until-you-conform. But the good news is, they won the “debate”. 
But ssssshhh don’t say nuffin’, I’ve proven my point: when exactly does Libertarian’s Live and Let Live begin because all I’m seeing is a lot of insults with expectation that you’ll conform to exactly WHAT they desire? 😐
@dancas2 @p2blogs @jethro_aryeh @gfhawkeson @itamra He is delusional.And condescending, and lots of things that explain the demise of #GOP
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 9, 2013
@itamra @gfhawkeson @jethro_aryeh Wow!Never really encountered that. I try to focus on the cross-party similarities. It doesn’t makesense
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 9, 2013
@itamra @gfhawkeson @jethro_aryeh Really? seems to be more of a “do what you want so long as you hurt no one else” idea to me.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 9, 2013
now, remember this tweet directly above… “as long as you hurt no one else”
@itamra @gfhawkeson @jethro_aryeh I don’t associate with those first two…eww!
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 9, 2013
@queerwire @gfhawkeson @itamra @jethro_aryehbetter ideas?! Shld we just kill the pwr grid and start back at the bill of rights by candle
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 9, 2013
@itamra I’ve def been called racist for disagreeing with forcing someone to go to a particular public school. Don’t know what to say!
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 9, 2013
@itamra I’m pretty sure Christians dominate all parties. I don’t know much about Baldwin, except that he’s registered dem. point me to info!
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 9, 2013
@itamra yikes! It seems you’re the anti-rush. Which is prob better, but still divisive. I’m more interested in working across party lines
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
@itamra On your profile pic, couldn’t the same be said for welfare. #libertarian don’t want to bail out anybody who Effed up.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
Now here’s where the head scratching moment begins. I sent link to this site which contained UNSOLICITED racist, misogynist and other degrading comments from his/her fellow libertarians, but this person zeroes in on my profile, and so begins their analysis (which person refers to as “debating”). But person skips past alllll the comments from libertarians and proceeds to “train” me. Gotta love that live and let live libertarian motto. He/she let the racists in their party slide and comes my way for a good ‘ol mind-f*ck game. 😐
But this next tweet, is an OPINION which they’re entitled to. But here’s where their leadership or “impress me” fails. Owsley, Kentucky has the HIGHEST welfare use in the country. It’s 99% white and 95% GOP. Start there with your opinions, leadership or “issues” regarding welfare, lead by example THERE at the heaviest source of the problem. Stop whining to people who can’t do anything about the issue other than vent along with you or ignore you as a waste of time! Do as I do: go to a source of the problem — Mitch McConnell!
@itamra the man hold a letter to wall street. The letter could be addressed to welfare recipients too.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
And notice person skipped past Venrock issue and targeted welfare recipients. WELL, IF YOU PAID ATTENTION TO VENROCK TYPES, there’d be more productivity (JOBS!!!!) in THIS country and LESS welfare recipients. And probably even in Owsley, Kentucky too!
@itamra I’m not concerned about the people you dislike the most, they don’t affect me. I’m moving forward with hopes a free country.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
😮 Not concerned about people I don’t like? Okay, ANOTHER failure. He/she SHOULD be concerned about the DOMINANT persons representing their party, especially if they’re expecting to lead others.
@itamra FYI. End it. That’s all I care about.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
Proving once again, their comprehension is really bad, 🙁 but again, they’re “debating” about their opinion instead of addressing their “end it” issue with highest source of problem: Mitch McConnell! 😮 But somehow telling me their opinions (lots of them) puts the ball in motion. 😐
@itamra be the first person to tell me something the govt does for me that I can’t do myself or live without.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
@itamra You’re more concerned with uniforms ( that I don’t wear) instead of the game. You’re not fighting for your country but against comp
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
The above is an assumption AND insult, but again, they’re “debating”…
@itamra I’ll continue. I can only shout so loud. I guess it’s true that you are what you hate.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
@itamra You put it out there, unless that link you sent is a character. (which I hope)
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
“you put it out there”? Oh I’m sorry, was that not my “do what you want, as long as you hurt no one” option that’s NOW subject to attack from a “live and let live libertarian”? 😐 But I’ve seen this script one too many times before from members of their own party, members they’re NOT concerned about while declaring they’re nothing like the persons pointed out. 
@itamra en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertari…Focus!
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
😐 ruh-roh, they’re on my timeline like white on rice, I’d better pay attention to them ONLY (Libertarianism), or I could get into trouble with a Libertarian for not doing what they want me to do. 😮
@itamra Getting warmer.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
@itamra Sure, rationale.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
@itamra I guess I would conclude you were no different from the fools we mocked at the beginning of this conversation.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
Conclude? 
now that’s a stretch… to come to a conclusion based upon their own opinions I didn’t ask for but politely said “thank you” after receiving their [u]opinion[/u].
@itamra it started for me many years ago. Step by step cutting waste is step one. Illegal wars need to end. States should make their laws.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
Here is where I see what the problem is: you ask a question, person JUST wants to express their opinions not related to direct question asked. I MEANT specifically, you’re a libertarian, which person defined earlier as “do what you want, as long as you don’t hurt anyone”, what specifically are you looking for me to say to satisfy your venting so that you can move on productively because I’m sensing you have some anger issues (just like Wayne Austin). normally I don’t waste time with these persons, I simply block because it’s the same ‘ol song: tell you what they want, f*ck what you’ve said because they’re “too important” to actually read and understand BUT want you to understand EXACTLY what they want at all times. um okay. Libertarianism! 😐
@itamra We want less and less and less. I think you’re confusing us with the twins who’ve been in charge.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
There they are again, hunting my timeline and replying to tweets NOT directed to that person at all. I don’t follow this person, NEVER saw them before person injected itself into conversation with someone else.
@itamra That’s not really advice. New to debate?
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
Stay classy and smart, Libertarianism…
“@itamra: @gfhawkeson yes, you’re absolutely right”#newtodebate#checkmate
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
YAAAYYYY!!! THEY’VE WON! does this mean, they’ll troll along and attempt to “convert” someone else to Libertarianism? Oh wait, I spoke too soon, they’re not done “schooling me”… ain’t Libertarianism GREAT?!
@itamra Talks a lot, says nothingA la limbaugh.No discussion. No points. Nothing. Pure avoidance.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
@itamra Oh sure, anytime. I’m glad you have time for me now.
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
@itamra Huh?
— J (@GFHawkeson) March 10, 2013
Well…I is learnin’! they sure schooled and impressed me on Libertarianism. I can’t wait to join their… oh wait, I’m a registered Independent. 🙂 I think I’ll stay here and continue making a difference where I can and not waste time with persons who can’t understand the difference between a question vs. opinion and WHEN to use either. 😉
But a more important question: with sooooo many self-appointed leaders of the Libertarian party, each with their own agendas and wishes that must become the “standard”, which direction do they go and how does that work out? “Follow me!” “No, follow ME!”, “NO, NO, FOLLOWWWWW ME!!!!”
