An actual conversation with a Libertarian authoritarian…

Conversation began with one person directly regarding Rush Limbaugh. In jumps this person, who later called our direct conversation a debate ๐Ÿ˜ฎ which was news to me given a debate starts with both parties KNOWING they’re debating, and involves questions and answers, not insults and berating-until-you-conform. But the good news is, they won the “debate”. :clap:

But ssssshhh don’t say nuffin’, I’ve proven my point: when exactly does Libertarian’s Live and Let Live begin because all I’m seeing is a lot of insults with expectation that you’ll conform to exactly WHAT they desire? ๐Ÿ˜

now, remember this tweet directly above… “as long as you hurt no one else”

Now here’s where the head scratching moment begins. I sent link to this site which contained UNSOLICITED racist, misogynist and other degrading comments from his/her fellow libertarians, but this person zeroes in on my profile, and so begins their analysis (which person refers to as “debating”). But person skips past alllll the comments from libertarians and proceeds to “train” me. Gotta love that live and let live libertarian motto. He/she let the racists in their party slide and comes my way for a good ‘ol mind-f*ck game. ๐Ÿ˜

But this next tweet, is an OPINION which they’re entitled to. But here’s where their leadership or “impress me” fails. Owsley, Kentucky has the HIGHEST welfare use in the country. It’s 99% white and 95% GOP. Start there with your opinions, leadership or “issues” regarding welfare, lead by example THERE at the heaviest source of the problem. Stop whining to people who can’t do anything about the issue other than vent along with you or ignore you as a waste of time! Do as I do: go to a source of the problem — Mitch McConnell!

And notice person skipped past Venrock issue and targeted welfare recipients. WELL, IF YOU PAID ATTENTION TO VENROCK TYPES, there’d be more productivity (JOBS!!!!) in THIS country and LESS welfare recipients. And probably even in Owsley, Kentucky too!

๐Ÿ˜ฎ Not concerned about people I don’t like? Okay, ANOTHER failure. He/she SHOULD be concerned about the DOMINANT persons representing their party, especially if they’re expecting to lead others.

Proving once again, their comprehension is really bad, ๐Ÿ™ but again, they’re “debating” about their opinion instead of addressing their “end it” issue with highest source of problem: Mitch McConnell! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ But somehow telling me their opinions (lots of them) puts the ball in motion. ๐Ÿ˜

The above is an assumption AND insult, but again, they’re “debating”…

“you put it out there”? Oh I’m sorry, was that not my “do what you want, as long as you hurt no one” option that’s NOW subject to attack from a “live and let live libertarian”? ๐Ÿ˜ But I’ve seen this script one too many times before from members of their own party, members they’re NOT concerned about while declaring they’re nothing like the persons pointed out. :shrug:

๐Ÿ˜ ruh-roh, they’re on my timeline like white on rice, I’d better pay attention to them ONLY (Libertarianism), or I could get into trouble with a Libertarian for not doing what they want me to do. ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

Conclude? :yawn: now that’s a stretch… to come to a conclusion based upon their own opinions I didn’t ask for but politely said “thank you” after receiving their [u]opinion[/u].

Here is where I see what the problem is: you ask a question, person JUST wants to express their opinions not related to direct question asked. I MEANT specifically, you’re a libertarian, which person defined earlier as “do what you want, as long as you don’t hurt anyone”, what specifically are you looking for me to say to satisfy your venting so that you can move on productively because I’m sensing you have some anger issues (just like Wayne Austin). normally I don’t waste time with these persons, I simply block because it’s the same ‘ol song: tell you what they want, f*ck what you’ve said because they’re “too important” to actually read and understand BUT want you to understand EXACTLY what they want at all times. um okay. Libertarianism! ๐Ÿ˜

There they are again, hunting my timeline and replying to tweets NOT directed to that person at all. I don’t follow this person, NEVER saw them before person injected itself into conversation with someone else.

Stay classy and smart, Libertarianism…

YAAAYYYY!!! :clap: THEY’VE WON! does this mean, they’ll troll along and attempt to “convert” someone else to Libertarianism? Oh wait, I spoke too soon, they’re not done “schooling me”… ain’t Libertarianism GREAT?!

Well…I is learnin’! they sure schooled and impressed me on Libertarianism. I can’t wait to join their… oh wait, I’m a registered Independent. ๐Ÿ™‚ I think I’ll stay here and continue making a difference where I can and not waste time with persons who can’t understand the difference between a question vs. opinion and WHEN to use either. ๐Ÿ˜‰

But a more important question: with sooooo many self-appointed leaders of the Libertarian party, each with their own agendas and wishes that must become the “standard”, which direction do they go and how does that work out? :shrug: “Follow me!” “No, follow ME!”, “NO, NO, FOLLOWWWWW ME!!!!”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.